Loony Literature is about being creative with literature. It is about creative reading as well as creative writing. As both a lover and graduate of this subject, I positively enjoy deconstructing texts from different points of view – that is what studying literature is about. It is not about knowing every quotation from Shakespeare as non literary people often assume. It is about taking a text and analysing and evaluating it whilst backing it all up with textual evidence. We can add to our arguments by reading the text from a certain perspective e.g. a feminist or a Marxist point of view. If we enjoy psychoanalytical theory we can use Lacan or even go down a Freudian route. The possibilities are endless and as long as we can back our argument up with textual evidence, we are free to do this. There is no right or wrong answer in literature – it is creativity heaven.
Much has been written about Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; in fact, far too much to mention in this introduction. I have been using the text as a springboard to write a play and workshops. However, as all great pieces of fiction tend to do, it has demanded that I read it yet again from a totally different angle.
I love the fact that Frankenstein was written by a teenager. The other detail about Mary Shelley which sits heavily in my consciousness is that her mother died through complications following her birth. I am both daughter and mother. The two relationships are entwined in my being like thread in tapestry. I feel so much sympathy for Mary Shelley as a young girl growing up with only other people’s stories of her mother.
These two facts have made me read Frankenstein again. I am going to read it as a subconscious cathartic writing exercise for Mary Shelley. In other words, Shelley wrote herself as Frankenstein. The monster is her dead mother, Mary Wollstonecraft. As a teenager, Mary would read on her mother’s grave in St Pancras Churchyard. The mother was beloved but unobtainable. It is bad enough as a teenager when your parents do not seem to understand your emotional turmoil. Mary did not simply have intentionally deaf ears to contend with but dead ears. Mary needed to find a way to communicate her isolation. I believe that Frankenstein can be read as a letter from Mary Shelley to Mary Wollstonecraft. How else can an abandoned daughter let her dead mother know what she went through whilst growing up without her? Fundamentally, as the dead mother was a literary forerunner of her day, there was only one way to get such a mother’s attention and that was to create her own literary masterpiece. Ironically, Mary Shelley conjured up her own dead mother in the position of abandoned child.
If the monster is supposed to portray her dead mother, why did she make him male? We all know that women used to constantly die of childbirth in those days; by re-inventing her mother as male, she prevents this taking place. She needs to keep her mother alive as she lives out the story of isolation Mary felt as a motherless child.
I am at the beginning of this reading of Frankenstein and hope that you will join me on the journey. I will be making regular posts as I travel on my own new reading journey of Frankenstein. My model for Frankenstein might not work out. Ultimately, by offering a hypothesis and then writing a notebook on my reading, I hope that readers of the posts will come up with their own valuable insights. If this works, I will tackle other delicious texts in the same way. So let’s talk about Frankenstein.
- Let’s Talk About Frankenstein (2) – Walton’s First Three Letters. (loonyliterature.com)
- Mary Shelley (petitefeministe.wordpress.com)
- Mary Shelley: Frankenstein’s mother (independent.co.uk)
17 responses to “Let’s Talk About FRANKENSTEIN 1”
One day I hope this world will understand that one size does NOT fit all.
Pingback: My Frankenstein Journey – A Creative Writing Journal. | loonyliterature
Pingback: My Frankenstein Journey (2) – A Creative Writing Journal. | loonyliterature
Pingback: My Frankenstein Diary 5 – a Creative Writing Journal. | loonyliterature
Pingback: My Frankenstein Journey 4 – a Creative Writing Journal | loonyliterature
Pingback: My Frankenstein Journey 3 – a Creative Writing Journal | loonyliterature
Pingback: 6 Great Reasons To Read To Teens. | loonyliterature
Pingback: Frankenstein « Earthpages.ca
Thank you for mentioning my post.
Pingback: My Frankenstein Dairy (9) – Can an author inspire us? | loonyliterature
Making the monster male also means being more objective. As writers we can either write from the perspective of our own gender – and make the ideal hero/heroine the person we would have liked to be (see Morse, Colin Dexter) – or we make a determined effort to get some distance between us and the protagonist. What better way than to write from a male POV, when the subject matter is so very authobiographical?
She must have also feared her mother as a real “monster” that overshadowed her literary ambitions – all daughters regard their mothers as rivals and vice versa.
That’s a very interesting comment. Iris Murdoch wrote from a male point of view quite a few times. It’s funny that you should have reminded me of her as I’m going to read her books again. Also, the idea of mothers and daughters being as rivals is interesting but not true in my own particular case, mum and I are really close. I wonder if it’s because we are so different to each other.
…you aren’t close because you regard each other as rivals deep down. You’ve probably MADE yourself to be as different to her as possible to carve out your own niche in life and get noticed. I know I did:) and I thought we had established we’re really twins…
Yes, I did make myself as different as possible. You’ve got me started on the giggles again with the twin thing as I can see us again scurrying along in the past with those darned pudding basin haircuts you conjured up.
Like a female Duane Dibbley from Red Dwarf?
I’ve not seen Red Dwarf but Will is a big fan so I shall ask him.
I recently watched ALL episodes again on Netflix. Wonderful stuff. You’ll adore Duane’s pudding basin hair cut.